No. 20-6419
Romell Broom v. Tim Shoop, Warden
IFP
Tags: clearly-established-law constitutional-interpretation cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment execution-attempt habeas-corpus robinson-v-california section-2254 sentencing supreme-court-precedent trop-v-dulles
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
SocialSecurity DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947) the clearly established United States Supreme Court precedent, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. §2254(d), on whether a second execution attempt on the same inmate is a violation of the Eighth Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947) the clearly established United States Supreme Court precedent, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. §2254(d), on whether a second execution attempt on the same inmate is a violation of the Eighth Amendment? i
Docket Entries
2021-03-25
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2021-03-18
Joint stipulation to dismiss the case pursuant Rule 46.1 filed.
2020-12-30
Suggestion of death of petitioner filed.
2020-12-24
Reply of petitioner Romell Broom filed.
2020-12-11
Brief of respondent Tim Shoop in opposition filed.
2020-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Romell Broom
Shirley Adele Shank — Law Office of S. Adele Shank, Petitioner
Shirley Adele Shank — Law Office of S. Adele Shank, Petitioner
Tim Shoop
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent