No. 20-642

Jorge Mendoza v. Uber Technologies Inc.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration arbitration-jurisdiction civil-procedure constitutional-due-process constitutional-law contract-law dispute-resolution due-process jurisdiction jurisdictional-limits legal-procedure procedural-rights
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Constitutional Due Process can be part of Arbitration Jurisdiction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Constitutional Due Process can be part of Arbitration Jurisdiction.

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent Uber Technologies Inc. to respond filed.
2020-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Jorge Mendoza
Jorge Alberto Mendoza — Petitioner
Uber Technologies Inc.
Michelle Anne KisloffHogan Lovells US LLP, Respondent