No. 20-6425
Tags: 18-usc-2113 18-usc-924(c) bank-robbery brandishing-a-firearm crime-of-violence dimaya-precedent firearm-brandishing johnson-ruling johnson-v-united-states sentencing-review sessions-v-dimaya
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-02-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether under this Court's rulings in Johnson and Dimaya, Mr. Meece's conviction and sentence for brandishing a firearm in relation to a crime of violence should be vacated because bank robbery under § 2113 is no longer a 'crime of violence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether under this Court’s rulings in Johnson and Dimaya, Mr. Meece’s conviction and sentence for brandishing a firearm in relation to a crime of violence should be vacated because bank robbery under § 2113 is no longer a “crime of violence.” i
Docket Entries
2021-03-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-01-27
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2021.
2020-12-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2020 to January 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Scott Meece
Michael Scott — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent