No. 20-6427

Marquis Wilson v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law due-process first-step-act retroactivity sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Related Cases: 20-6099 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Section 403 of the First Step Act of 2018 applies to defendants whose convictions and sentences remain pending on direct review

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Section 403 of the First Step Act of 2018, which is expressly titled a “clarification” of the penalty provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(C), should apply to defendants who were sentenced before the enactment of the Act but whose convictions and sentences remain pending on direct review and, therefore, are not yet final. 2. Whether counsel violates a defendant’s right to autonomy when the defendant intends to contest all of the government’s evidence and counsel stipulates without his consent to a jurisdictional element of the offense.

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Marquis Wilson
Alison BrillOffice of the Federal Public Defender, D.N.J., Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent