No. 20-6453

Marcos Alejandro Gonzalez Flores v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process fourth-amendment search-and-seizure suppression-hearing suppression-motion witness-testimony
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause, the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause, or some other authority guarantees a criminal defendant the right to cross-examine the government's witnesses at a pretrial hearing into whether a search complied with the Fourth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented The lower courts are in conflict about whether the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause, the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, or some other authority guarantees a criminal defendant the right to cross-examine the government’s witnesses at a pretrial hearing into whether a search complied with the Fourth Amendment. This case presents a good vehicle for the Court to resolve this conflict by addressing this question: When, in an attempt to meet its burden to prove that a search complied with the Fourth Amendment, the government proffers declarations from the searching officers, does the defendant have the right to cross-examine those witnesses before a court denies a suppression motion based on their declarations? ii

Docket Entries

2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Marcos Alejandro Gonzalez Flores
James H. LocklinFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent