Whether the appellate court erred in denying the appellant's motion to dismiss court-appointed counsel and allow him to submit pro se supplemental briefing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED f. Whether, uvidler the erreunctances Presented the atfollate court erred in denyin4 Ak. da) bothing’ washion to Sila atfellant bial LleA V4 court abfrated Counsel, ar in the. alteractve , Allow him to sukmit Pro se sufflemental briefing CAL. 39)? a. Lhether, under te csteumerbances fresented | the alfeilale cout etred ia Aeauingd CAL 48) Wattial moken te dAiSmiss covurt-athonted , counsel, stilo afvellert lonel fled by counsel, and allowd hint to Proceed Pro se on Avett abfeal (AL 45) ?