No. 20-6468
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was sufficient foundation to support the District Court's drug quantity approximation?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether there was sufficient foundation to support the District Court’s drug quantity approximation? 2. Whether the Eighth Circuit’s decision to affirm the District Court’s drug quantity approximation conflicts with decisions from other circuits that have addressed the issue? 3. Whether the District Court’s enhancement for obstruction of justice conflicts with the Eighth Circuit’s precedent?
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Kinzey Shaw
Jack Everett Zuger — Pearce Durick PLLC, Petitioner
Jack Everett Zuger — Pearce Durick PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent