Whether the Third Circuit erred in not addressing conduct rendered non-criminal by an intervening Supreme Court decision

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \, nethec the Vhicd Circy + Erred in Not Addcessing Conduct has been . Mendered Nonv-crimina| by an intervening Supreme Cour} Decision “Mathis y United States” OD. Whethethe Third Circvit’ Erred | \N Not Addressing Actvua| INNocene Claim of Caree, OFF enole chal| — OF Con vichon in the qMeN ge Bf Statve dues, Plea Agreement 7 “meat Challenge } Double Waiver Proui'sisn ,