No. 20-6471
Israel Washington v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure court-standard due-process judicial-discretion legal-standard standard-of-review testimony-readback trial-procedure
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying a request for the readback of testimony
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : [1] WHETHER CERTIORARI SHOULD BE GRANTED CONCERNING THE : : DISTRICT COURT'S APPLICATION OF THE ABUSE OF . DISCRETION STANDARD IN RELATION TO THE DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR THE READBACK OF TESTIMONY? WHEN THE COURT ADOPTS A POLICY OF DISALLOWING READBACKS, THE COURT HAS ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO EXERCISE iT. (i)
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 31, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent