No. 20-6480

Maurice Freeman v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment bailey-v-united-states detention fourth-amendment immediate-vicinity michigan-v-summers police-authority premises-search probable-cause reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure search-warrant
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the rule of Michigan v. Summers extend to individuals on a public street near the residence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the rule of Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), which permits police officers executing a search warrant to detain occupants of a residence to be searched without reasonable suspicion or probable cause of criminal activity, extend to individuals on a public street near the residence? 2. What does the term “immediate vicinity” mean, as used in Bailey v. United States, 568 U.S. 186 (2013), in which this Court said, “[t]he categorical authority to detain incident to the execution of a search warrant must be limited to the immediate vicinity of the premises to be searched.” i

Docket Entries

2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2020)

Attorneys

Maurice Freeman
Becky KurzFederal Public Defender Office, Petitioner
Becky KurzFederal Public Defender Office, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent