Did District Court violate Matuck's Due Process right when it held a trial over seven years after his arrest?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \, Did Distwiet Courk violate Matucks Due Process rig when it Weld Vow dive over Seven Years afier Aviat ? 2, DLs Due Prose Violated when Matuck was net eresent when loiv alive, wos Conducted oy an mvestly ctor ined e 40 vefair toy Ane Cobre. 2. Did Change in law deny Matuce tuc Rest amendment yique +o apeeal? . law Woracy Viole ted dq. Ts Lvs amendment viguet -te ween iba: OR fo tre Covid-'4 parclemic5S. 0S the Texas State Case Proper 4s aolofress Matucks Fedleval Case? lo. Was trial Counsel ineffective for failen 45 eusuce an impartial yen! , 7, Wot fs element of ex emeditation under 153° B, Was trial Counse| iacftective doe stipulating te auw element of the offense% a. Ov ws Age ellaat Counsel inetlechve for appealing the elewent that was ghee stipulated ® 10. Did Diskrek Cour’ evr when ik did . vot questor yurov aoouk MuUvasr victow Roaymernol Brown Auw dg. VO\V Kivet