Whether the government is improperly denying a defendant's right to a pre-attachment hearing under the 5th Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I) HOW TS GOVERNMENT IapreTZNG BeFore Fees APPEARANCE ok PRE-Tadichment NEARING 7 Ano Wiles Tate Kole 708) oF Feat tim Kijhl te wazve? 2) Prosaare cause 2 Mosr Be DE zZ BEFORE PROBABLE CA use NEACEN, a OK 0ke AkeeST; Hons Ake Cstis.o TORY PMererENG 3) yi Can orca ent eid Yee WETH 1% U.8.6 $924 ¢ayt2) “Knowingly” vrelahng $ 122G10), . G ‘ W a fEVE ANOWINGIY? (Ze. Knowingly 76 posses THE KmowllGe oF indersbord) D189 UsS.€ F722 aya $s OF FF AFFECTING Contuerec rn n Pitedeed a CHET ICU AR SeniSE, ONIY Possessions zy ag SvcH Exnerugen ee ate Ris CONVTE TING POSS. oF FrkeAkm wen MO UNDER 1% U.s.c $922 eee N 224) CMAGE 7, ancl Hour APE THEY SEN TEN EZ nie WHEN ; TS NO Tae coe LIMPRIS OWI ME ST 2 5.) How rs Govern : MENT COnTEND] SEPERATED WHEN Contes TING ROO a Le pea pate cen ten ae STATES AEE SOS . TA 4) THE Constrz otro , Ano 5” Amenonecryy ONSTETOTION AS Dt 23 WRET TEN 2 (LE; ¥* TIWHY wxro © WHY DIO GoveRnmenr wor OLovtoe TORTS DICT OWAL STATEMENT op) AOAIT FoR A€tesr oR seaecil AT TIME OF AResr m AT fe. a NE i SSENTMN EMIT HetRING@ As 0.8. CRIP AND US Constitodions STATES? S\How Age Qovékumenr PROVING THAT DEFEOA, j Of HAS BEEN SHIeLep i INT KNEW ek Knows Free, TRAN km of Ammo, LIS SPORTED Ty INTERSTATE oR FoREZaN Commeacep FX tn cf | WN CHALLENGING THAT Z Cone flow Aee COURTS Tune “in Aer fo see S22 De OeEeteoveo ynclé@ “é Uns.¢ $2403¢A) No Fel or Lofen 5 2 AND SENTENCT IA WHEN THERE ws TSONMENT UNDER THE Bry /srary: : TUTE IN ETS SapsquLan fee ? (i) —_—_ tame, sil —_