Whether a litigant is deprived of due process of law

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a litigant is deprived of due process of law when a judge issues an order to the filing clerk in a pending case that the clerk stamps and signs the orders and not to allow any hearings on the application sfrom the litigant and issues Stamped orders or illegible signed order which even though denied by the lower tribunal Judge are upheld by the second District Court of Appeals without an opinion or give the litigant the ability to challenge the factual basis for such an order. 2.Whether a judge who issues such an order is abuse of authority and biased. 3. Whether the Florida Appellate court exercised its function to work in the interest of public and Justice or supported Conspiracy, corruption, Fraud and Civil theft for the financial or other gains of the fellow attorneys, government, banks or any wealthy individual, corporations or any other entities rather than upholding the law in the interest of the public. 4, Whether the Florida courts violated the the Judicial Code and the following federal laws and rules under the Hobbs Act. A) Infringement of the 5" and 14 th Amendments of the Petitioner by denying her a fair evidentiary hearing and taking her home and her equity for her retirement. 5. Whether the Florida courts violated the following federal laws and rules by: Violating Moratorium by the U.S. President and the Florida Governor by doing hearings for final judgment on pending Foreclosure cases during COVID-19 pandemic. PARTIES: NATIONSTAR, NEELAM UPPAL JIDGES OF THE SECONDCA OF FLORIDA NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and SLEET JJ., :