No. 20-6495

Michael Alford v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fourth-amendment government-seizure personal-property property-return property-rights riley-v-california search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court erred in refusing to return personal property

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : | Questions tb. Wether The Court erred in Refusing To Returo | yPecsonal Property» _ 2 Right. _ Ja Obtain Their Oun MPersonal_and Private [roperty _ That Pertyiins Only To Therr Personal financial a —_ land Medical States ond Their tell=being «i _ 3 tether The Government has a Right Ta Retain my — Personal Property toa Criminal Case Ushere That a Lropertsy has_wlo Connection Ta The Offenses Was jot Purchased _at Ihe _Time_of The alleged Offenses ond Contains Mo Content Ihat_links Ie The Offenses _ 4s tether a Person_has:a Constitutional Private _ _ Interest To Obtain Theic Oun Personal [op erty ‘plight of Riley le California» 573 US 373 Cael). Page po CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST PERSONS: Michael Alford (Appellant) Melvin Alford (Father) Ethel Alford (Mother) Angie Moore (Sister) Michelle Daffin (Attorney) Jonathan Dingue (Attorney) Barbara Sanders (Attorney) Larry Bodiford (Judge) Robert Hinkle (Judge) Jeffrey Tharp (US Attorney) ORAL ARGUMENT: Appellant request oral argument.

Docket Entries

2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Michael Alford
Michael Alford — Petitioner
Michael Alford — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent