Michael Alford v. United States
Privacy
Whether the court erred in refusing to return personal property
No question identified. : | Questions tb. Wether The Court erred in Refusing To Returo | yPecsonal Property» _ 2 Right. _ Ja Obtain Their Oun MPersonal_and Private [roperty _ That Pertyiins Only To Therr Personal financial a —_ land Medical States ond Their tell=being «i _ 3 tether The Government has a Right Ta Retain my — Personal Property toa Criminal Case Ushere That a Lropertsy has_wlo Connection Ta The Offenses Was jot Purchased _at Ihe _Time_of The alleged Offenses ond Contains Mo Content Ihat_links Ie The Offenses _ 4s tether a Person_has:a Constitutional Private _ _ Interest To Obtain Theic Oun Personal [op erty ‘plight of Riley le California» 573 US 373 Cael). Page po CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST PERSONS: Michael Alford (Appellant) Melvin Alford (Father) Ethel Alford (Mother) Angie Moore (Sister) Michelle Daffin (Attorney) Jonathan Dingue (Attorney) Barbara Sanders (Attorney) Larry Bodiford (Judge) Robert Hinkle (Judge) Jeffrey Tharp (US Attorney) ORAL ARGUMENT: Appellant request oral argument.