When the doors of the Court(s] are willfully, maliciously, and improperly closed to non-influential, self-represented persons

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The issue here goes beyond a miscarriage of justice. It’s lower court’s blatant and outright refusal to administer justice, when law warrants otherwise; it’s contrary to what this court in Mutchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225, 240, (1972) proclaimed, “throws open the doors of the United States Courts to those whose rights under the Constitution are denied or impaired”. I: When the doors of the Court(s] are willfully, maliciously, and improperly closed to non-influential, self-represented persons, like petitioner thereby foreclosing (1) a civil forum of justice, and (2) denies petitioner his day in court”, simply because the courts want to protect their own kind via abuse of power, does this court’s refusal to intervene and foreclose a civil forum send a disturbing message that the ones in (politics) remains the only avenue for attention/justice? ; II: Did the Sixth Circuit Court of appeals deny appellant the right to be heard and have a full appellate review as provided by the United States Constitution of the First Amendment. III: If the Northern District Court lacks jurisdiction because an appeal was taken in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, does waiting for that appeal to be fully determined, deny appellant the right to appeal in a (“timely”) latter proceeding. 9