Shannon Riley v. Carrie Kathleen Meehan
DueProcess
Has the 'public interest' requirement been met under the Full Faith and Credit Clause to entertain review of a petition for a Writ of Mandamus?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : (1) Has the "public interest" requirement pursuant to South Carolina Appellate Court Rutés (SCACR) 245(a) been met under the . Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U™S. Constitution, Article 1, Section lV, “.-. to entertain review of a petition for . , a Writ of Mandamus’ in the Court's original jurisdiction? (2) Has the "public interest" requirement pursuant to Key v Currie, 305 S.C. 115, 406 | . S.E. 2d 356 (1991):been met under the . Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section lV to entertain review of'a petition for a Writ of Mandamus in the Court's original jurisdiction? (3) Has the Supreme Court of South Carolina impeached Petitioner's due process under the Fourteenth Amendment when it failed to entertain a Writ of Mandamus relating : to "public interest" legislated” by Congress under the. Full) Faith and Credit Clause, Article 1, Section iv, of the U.S. Constitution.?