No. 20-6514

Jimmy Ray Weatherholt, Jr. v. Virginia

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2020-12-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-prosecution due-process fair-trial judicial-conduct recusal right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether trial counsel's suspension and ultimate disbarment during the pendency of criminal charges deprived the defendant of his constitutional right to counsel during critical stages of the prosecution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Sixth Amendment provides that “[iJn all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” U.S. Const. amend. VI. A critical component of that right is the “right of a defendant who does not require appointed counsel to choose who will represent him.” United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 144 (2006). Whether trial counsel’s suspension and ultimate disbarment during the pendency of criminal charges deprived Mr. Weatherholt of his constitutional right to counsel during critical stages of the prosecution against him. ii PARTIES TO PROCEEDING AND RULE 26.6 STATEMENT Petitioner is Jimmy R. Weatherholt, Jr. Respondent is the Commonwealth of Virginia. No party is a corporation.

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Jimmy Ray Weatherholt, Jr.
William Davis AshwellAshwell & Ashwell, PLLC, Petitioner