Question not identified

ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW @ The Defendants did not make a single factual or valid point, but still prevailed in the case. That is clearly unjust. @ lam not happy with the service (in terms of business, but also postage) that I received from the Federal District Court of Maryland or the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. @ The Federal District Court of Maryland made the wrong decision. The decision was not based on law, but instead, on lies. This injustice should be corrected. . @ The Federal Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit made a fraudulent judgement. This injustice should be corrected. Z Il. PARTIES Plaintiff/Appellant Tamara Rouhi 125 Fennington Circle ; Owings Mills MD 21117 : CVS Health Inc Walgreen Co. One CVS Drive 200 Wilmot Rd. Woonsocket, RI 02895 Deerfield IL 60015 Ahold Delhaize/Giant Food McKesson Ine 8301 Professional Place Suite 115 One Post Street, Landover, MD 20785 San Francisco, CA, 94104 Wegmans Food Markets Inc 1500 Brooks Ave Rochester, NY 14624 , III. PREVIOUS PROCEEDINGS The Original case (Tamara Rouhi V CVS Pharmacy et al, Case #19CV701) was filed at the United States District Court, District of Maryland, Baltimore, on 3/6/19. Judgment granting the Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss were entered on 2/24/20. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration was denied on 3/10/20. An Appeal was filed at the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Tamara Rouhi V CVS Pharmacy et al, Case #20-1462), and “judgement” by a clerk was entered on 8/24/20. 4