No. 20-6543
Curtis Moody v. Chae Harris, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in affirming the district court's dismissal of petitioners' claims challenging the constitutionality of Ohio's congressional redistricting plan
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Cvyet , \ enoufs) era iia Pe er ot Las SES Wer ina 0 ; ‘ani. Sahieve hak CXS Iv Pr Ake \ mK Ko ike (tS XX \uek jt Neale bk Soo aah, oh et — INOS la ale C\ On CD AY MEP Puurel ar Ae ac LAS Sn OV eS Y AL a of OK NOC AS | A> Ad \) ds Ke j ay ( €. Bai VA | | |
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent Harris, Warden to respond filed.
2020-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Harris, Warden
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent