Does a denial of counsel on an initial state post-conviction habeas corpus application activate the exclusionary provision of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1)(B)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. DOES A DENIAL OF COUNSEL ON AN INITIAL STATE POST-CONVICTTON HABEAS CORPUS APPLICATION, CONTRARY TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME , COURT'S’ PRECEDENT OF MARTINEZ v.RVAN, 566 u.S. 1,°(2012) AND ; : . TREVING v..THALER, 569 U.S. 413 (2013), ACTIVATE THE EXCLUSTONARY PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1)(B), WHEN THE STATE CREATED IM, PEDIMENT CONTINUES TO EXIST? . ; 2. DOES THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUITY PRINCIPLE OF HABEAS CORPUS AF-= FORD A PERSON PROTECTION OF UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT oo AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AMENDMENTS OUTSIDE OF THE NORMAL ; ONE YEAR BAR OF 28 U.S.C. §2254 (d)(1), MORE THAN TWENTY YEARS BEYOND THE FILING DATE DUE TO "PROCEDURAL DEFAULT?" ; oc (i) .