Whether the U.S. Magistrate Judge violated the petitioner's due process rights by acting like the lawyer for Warden Kiser et al. by responding to the request for notice of appeal/bond on 10/31/19 without allowing the attorney for Warden Kiser et al. to respond first?

No question identified. : | 3 ABWE OF OSCRETHN) 2 |. Dion Us TOAGISTRATS pte ' THE ‘ ORGISTRATE yupGe VIOLATE Bensed ae USCHSSADGY ACTING LIKE THE | — LAWYER FR WARDEN KISER ef ab By REeSPON OING Te ie ReauesyT hye notice 0A APPEAL /BuND ON lo}ay]iG WITHoUT AlliwsinG The fF ATH RNEL FoR UpRoen Kise et AL Ta BestanO FIRST ? A ISNT A Jule RESPENS) BIL) Ty $5 To HEIR PROUEMENTS Flom THE PLaw TF BND THE DEFENDANT BEFORE MAKING A Ruling BON A CHE 7D Ni NwlATON OF THE Ut IMENOMENT | 3 WAONIT IT A Vblaton of a6 uscyssa).b) Ae US NAGSTRAZE dubbe RopeRiCK C. youn OF. THE US. DISTRICT COURT FoR “WE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VA TO Seno A Becuest—fo Resfonse Request 10 WARDEN KiSéRetal ON APRIL. 22, dodo WHI ang , Fact WAS pBFTR US macsmeTe Fu0ce Pep) COUN plkeReg Ingoe &° Ruling OW fo) ay) 9 ¢ HL yp 27 QS0 A NwcaTinn OF Pholgartaniac musconoucT FoR ThE AT HLNEY AR WARPE/I ” T febPonoTo THe PEstare ksthetal H NoT A st Joo? hepuesTeo Sy We DUE baTE SF Yaa y 5 DONT “THE US maas mele Bupce Hey C yang oF We US EpStekri ONTRICT, § Falk BNO TE MukH URCUT CURT OF Fuobes Wynn DIAZ Awe Flags WwaTe We aor pue poocess Clause OF Peste CT) Clawie Ome gubine on <fuus Case, BETOME [GA prpeNOOEN ed wAROEN, hISER, eFal PRESENTED 9 TH I, SOO Ed en) RES Donte 2 (>, VioLtiTons OF 1+ PeNaMENT ~ * 1 .