Whether affirmative evidence exists to establish Congress' intention under 18 USCS §24(b) to find City of non-medical family support service provider guilty of health care fraud(18 USCS Sec.1347)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether affirmative evidence exists to establish Congress’ intention under 18 USCS §24(b) to find City of non; medical family support service provider, under Article VII of Pennsy; lvania Public Welfare Code Title 55 of the Pennsylvania Code 55 PA Code §3130.12¢€c)(1) guilty of health care fraud(18 USCS Sec.1347). 2) Whether. Manamela is liable for the death of DK(a minor) under MEBHI's supervision pursuant to 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann §6302;3 whereas, the Civil Court ruled that under Pennsylvania and Third Circuit StateGreated-danger doctrine, Manamela and MEBHI were not culpable. 3) Whether New Jersey District Court erred by failing to. review doucume-. nts(authentic documents such as Contract(s)) declared under penalty of perjury pursuant to Title 28 USCS. §1746; and allowing dismissal of Manamela's Actual Innocent Petition as 2255 under disguise of 2241 under Rule 12(€b)(6), and claiming "Lack of Jurisdiction."