No. 20-6556
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-sentencing due-process federal-sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether certiorari review should be granted where the Eleventh Circuit affirmed Bass' sentence where Bass' sentence was unreasonable in light of the statutory sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. §3553(a)-(f) and principles applied by the advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED BASS’ SENTENCE WHERE BASS’ SENTENCE WAS UNREASONABLE IN LIGHT OF THE STATUTORY SENTENCING FACTORS LISTED IN 18 U.S.C. §3553(A)-(F) AND PRINCIPLES APPLIED BY THE ADVISORY FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES. i
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent