Whether the district court invited error resulting in a fundamental pleading defect

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT INVITED ERROR RESULTING IN , FUNDAMENTAL PLEADING DEFECT BY PERMITTING “INCORPORATED | GROUNDS” NOT EXPLAINED IN THE PETITION TO GO FORWARD, INTENTIONALLY CREATING WINDFALL FOR THE RESPONDENT BY | STATING THE GROUNDS WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS A REPLY TO THE ANSWER, WHICH DID NOT ADDRESS ANY THEREOF. THE UNCORRECTED DEPRIVATION WARRANTS SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF THIS COURT, WHERE RULE 4, RHCP AND . ARE DEFIED, PRECEDENT IS LACKING AND PETITIONER WILL PERISH IN PRISON WITHOUT INTERVENTION.