No. 20-6593

Dustin Lee MacLeod v. William Moritz, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-provisions federal-indian-law federal-jurisdiction indian-treaty legal-interpretation native-american-rights supreme-law supreme-law-of-the-land treaty-rights
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is an 'Indian Treaty' the Supreme Law of the Land?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED (Rule 14.1(a)) Is an “Indian Treaty” the Supreme Law of the Land?

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent William Moritz, Wade Hamilton, Steve Milford, Scott Whitcomb, Rick McDonald, Greg Drogowski, Eric Botorff, Lori Buford, and Dennis Knapp. to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Dustin MacLeod
Dustin Lee MacLeod — Petitioner
Dustin Lee MacLeod — Petitioner
William Moritz, Wade Hamilton, Steve Milford, Scott Whitcomb, Rick McDonald, Greg Drogowski, Eric Botorff, Lori Buford, and Dennis Knapp.
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent