Is the intent of FERPA to protect the privacy of student and faculty as a preliminary subsociety, not use 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(a)(4)(B)G&ii) in a punitive manner to exclude discloser of evidence on student as a means towards censorship?

QUESTION PRESENTED ; Petitioner was in the civil process of recovering . a withheld property through replevin, that the University of St. Thomas Mn claimed was not in : procession and rescinding academic sanctions for the property being removed. The Court ruled the Property was in procession and be returned. However, the sanctions were not rescinded, since Discovery for evidence by the court was refused Discovery was sought to learn the process and rationale for the academic sanctions, nongermane contrived expulsion. Discovery Rule 29 or FERPA behooves granting access to the student Petitioner’s “written directive not complied with” and sanctioned. The Minnesota Supreme Court concurred with the Court of Appeals, citing lack of Petitioner's material fact are “mere : averments”, despite being briefed by the Petitioner’s that substantiating evidence of the academic sanctions is the student’s competing and heightened deterrent for access and amend conferred, in part, by 20 U.S.C. § 1232g (FERPA). The Material fact that sanctions exist suggests there is alleged evidence without refute. Refutable evidence concedes access to investigate and amend. through the due process of discovery. THE QUESTION PRESENTED IS Is the intent of FERPA to protect the privacy of student and faculty as a preliminary subsociety, not use 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(a)(4)(B)G&ii) in a punitive manner to exclude discloser of evidence on student as a means towards censorship? If college hearings rises to the level of capricious by the courts for review, should Discovery Rule 29 and : those evident material facts be relevant towards Due Process in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution? ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN MULLANEY V. ST. THOMAS Minnesota Supreme . Court No. A19-0964 John, Paul Mullaney, Petitioner, v. University of St. Thomas, by and through its Commissioner of Higher Education, Betsy Talbot , Respondent. Decision Date: June 22, 2020 Minnesota Appeals Court No. A 19-0964 John, Paul Mullaney, Petitioner, v. University of St. Thomas Decision Date: June 17, 2019 Minnesota Fourth Judicial District Court, Hennepin County Cause No. 27-CV-18-16185 John, Paul Mullaney, Petitioner, v. University of St. Thomas, Decision Date: June 1, 2019