Whether the construction of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED TS Cr Liaw, Coal Creo Ga Sige | Cont of Frpenl And (MSSBIOP| Supreme Courts Piadiags And col, Ghat Ackles PCR, claims AcE, presale) pe cleacly ecrenousy based | Leds Conilt a MS5iSSAO} Supreme Coucts —sSitbhshed ch onan precelont a fas Rowlard V. SHE £2 So.3d 593 C788 oI DAVISSEN v. Ghats, BSD Se. 24 wal drs 22 a dokhem Wo Stale, U7 So HORI (nis 268, Ail Ps sath, | yiolates “Pickles th filo ights te Due QrocssS aad Equal Pateche) ot Haus | | | / ak ° foe Vkec the conic, ames 2 aol vet sina alti uss Caash® , VACA/FAQ THE Lvo4 TS Sed otc jor adan es praseag dpavicliad ants SEVINEL “Ta \e aX a cael RARE ustthouty €UEr Se SRA Gawd RO AIONS Pears eands Sony age ws Raw. « WL on ox Qadis. Bates Shas AN 7S, 7EIEET 008 QdaweN 4 Sists, 266 SH Bh IWS 2D) P Lohether the’ cansira chug, prada B Se Tory added” 78S SEF 7883 WA Jos y vesheucS2 gael) e gantts he €& Fondamnedts Cans ahodal virmistvor . Bases on Dasbac’, SIs , && So SOS f Gass)? SS) Whefier re Full ehrast fads ot Wi taut any cdesratctseee death as BN ESBeNT: elemgtir TS Capital Ther , paraumtl B97-S-IV@VED F