Michael R. Spengler v. Los Angeles County District Attorney
SocialSecurity
Whether federal habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is available to criminal defendants challenging the legality of their confinement before exhausting state remedies
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. ow Filints, A Federal Halkens Corpus FOr GriMINAl DefeNDANTS IN Challenging The LEGALLY OF their CONFINEMENT before +neir State ATIALY AFTET Prooving and /O®ASSUMING MS State remedies were ceork nope ae the US: DIStTICHE cout™ ApPPIY 28 Y ISH or 22417 AS 2241 1S Nor aulece © to the TESTICHS OF sne MED DA: OF 24 USC 2254. AND SiNCe 2241 1S WKEIY {A Continums PTeTAL CONEINEMEN+ ) \S \ uhiect VO KEING Dismissed wr aN ce queso , which we Romer reeis +net it Should Not ke becAUSe anere aret will be Continued RUT Nes WW his State proceeainas That sould PON \\M YO be atlowed TO FNC ® Ane! CK Srdiere: Habeas. 2) IT1S obvious That Dovble Jeopardy bits enbecded Coumreral estoppe| (S™ Amendment IS Q COONIZO@%lE PHeleas CIAIM. Vowever t+nefre ate (2)magor United States SLPrTemMe Court CASES (StunclePer ) R(AShe V-SWENSON ) IN CONTWoVeRSY thar Needs resoluHON. ThANK-Tou (fFelAted tO TIN COATPOVeL, OF Ave esrepel Doce) is