No. 20-6627
Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. v. South Carolina Department of Employment Workforce, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights civil-rights-act discrimination due-process employment-workforce equal-protection institutional-racism systemic-racism title-vii
Key Terms:
DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Define the purpose of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Civil Rights Act of 1991
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented is: (1). Define the purpose of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Civil Rights Act of 1991. (2). Did the false application of NEPOTISM and Barred From Applying intentionally applied by South Carolina Department of Employment Workforce violated the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Civil Rights Act of 1991.
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-29
Reply of petitioner Clarence Jenkins filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-14
Brief of respondents SC Dept. of Employment Workforce, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2021)
Attorneys
Clarence Jenkins
Clarence B. Jenkins Jr. — Petitioner
SC Dept. of Employment Workforce, et al.
Tierney Felicia Dukes — Boykin & Davis. LLC, Respondent