Did the district court judge error in denying the petitioner's habeas corpus petition?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. DID THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ANDREW R. JACOBSEN ERROR, In denying the Petitioner's Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2801, when the Petitioner did show cause of action for discharge pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 292801? . a BS 2. DID THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ANDREW R. JACOBSEN ERROR, In denying the Petitioner's Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus without granting an Evidentiary Hearing pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2805? 3. DID THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ANDREW R. JACOBSEN ERROR, In denying the Petitioner's . Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus, when there was a Jurisdictional Error present in the Petitioner's Petition? . 4. DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF NEBRASKA ERROR, In denying the Petitioner relief pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2801? . 5. DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF NEBRASKA ERROR, In sustaining the Appellee's Motion For Summary Affirmance, even~though the Court Of Appeals For The State Of Nebraska cannot determirle the Constitutionality of a Statute? . 6. DID THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT ERROR, In denying the Petitioner's Petition For Further Review in this matter without an Appealable answer? 7. DID THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT ERROR, by giving an Unconstitutional and Erroneous Order in this matter, that failed to state a reason for that denial? 8. IS THE NEB. REV. STAT. § 29-2801 UNCONSTITUTIONAL, When the Petitioner was denied the rights of the Writ, even-though the Petitioner raised a Collateral Attack? 9. IS THE NEB. REV. STAT. § 29-2801 UNCONSTITUTIONAL, When the Statutory language is | " ambiguous " because it is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation? 10. WAS THE ORDER'S IN THE LOWER COURT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL, when the decision's in this matter to deny the Petitioner relief is contrary to clearly established federal , law under the habeas statute? . 4 . , / . .