No. 20-6640
James David Perryman v. United States
Tags: 2nd-amendment commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process federal-criminal-law firearm-possession firearms interstate-commerce sentencing-enhancement standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional? Whether USSG §3C1.1(1) permits the assessment of a two-level enhancement for the commission of perjury at the trial of a non-codefendant? ii
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-24
Reply of petitioner James David Perryman filed. (Distributed)
2021-03-10
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 10, 2021.
2021-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2021 to March 10, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-08
Response Requested. (Due February 8, 2021)
2021-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 15, 2021)
Attorneys
James David Perryman
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent