No. 20-6642

Kevin W. Dunigan v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-17
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process sovereign-immunity standing takings
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should all of plaintiff's civil and punitive compensations be attributed to Kevin Wayne Phillips vs. Jehovah, Yahweh Christ?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESTEINS PRESKwe PTO Should all of’ plain’ ewwil and punidne comp4nsatone be atbibuted ty Kevin \el Oungan it. Tohovah, Ratag Javytah while all equa sted atto/nay's fxs fur Or ce paint ihcompasims 33.5% of’ all civil compenrations with a 3S multoler be attributed to Kevin oyna Phillips Sra Mt Elohim Yohvuth Chmst 7 6 Alco should all MAavtsted ha bLas cohpusr type aM £e Statutory atte May \F four aly bk attributed to Kewa Wayne Phcllips Sy tu Mn —Clahin Yahweh Christ, Lncom passing all fe| gucsted multig herr Artwoith standing all — Sovereign patholosistr, DNA 2xperty Health Cane Profe svi Maly woth their [Stack SOG A Aruake Lar TG Oba rp including plaint Fhe’ technologically rauy invertigatwr Ham's fees and all mautrted mult’ pliers q © Should all of planter’ dual soverrign nctial taxes and church tither be paid into there respecte coulkers ? tl | "

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Kevin W. Dunigan
Kevin W. Dunigan — Petitioner