No. 20-6651

Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2020-12-18
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights contempt-of-writ court-securities CUSIP cusip-number due-process human-trafficking money-laundering standing subpoena-compliance tort-claims
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether courts have become vehicles for pedophiles, MS13, sex and human traffickers, and drug cartels to launder money using various ruses, including CUSIP numbers and financial instruments

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Courts across this Republic have systematically become vehicles for pedophiles, MS13, sex, human traffickers and drug cartels to launder monies using variety of ruses, inter alia, using security instruments created from each and every court cases through the CUSIP’, when the alleged claimants have got nothing to do with the alleged financial transactions that never ever happened or happens in spite of their false representations to the contrary that they do. ' The Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures "CUSIP". Every case whether criminal or civil or even probate, is assigned a CUSIP number and traded on wall street among various deep state operatives who launder monies obtained from various unlawful activities including but not limited to kidnapping over 800,000 children on an annual basis in this Republic alone, selling their organs and committing all kinds of other heinous crimes on those children using various other conduits and ruses inter alia : Credit Default Swaps (CDSs), Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDOs), Yield Spread Premiums, and other ruses such as but not limited to obtaining federal and state grants which are obtained and distributed among members of these racketeering clubs. -1 All cases, whether civil or criminal, et.al. are assigned Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures ("CUSIP") numbers and traded on wall street as securities. Petitioner served Respondents Mister Sunil R. Kulkarni ("Kulkarni") and Miss Mary E. Arand ("Arand") with two subpoenas for their furnishing the sources of the monies used to monetize two cases in Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara--Case Numbers 17cv314286 and 17CH007672 through the CUSIP. The monies obtained by Superior Court in monetizing Case Number 17cv314286 and Case Number 17CH007672 which is the nexus to Case Number 17cv314286, managed by Mister Kulkarni and Miss Arand, seem to be from inter alia, sex and human trafficking, pedophilia, drug cartel money laundering without attorneys having any power of attorney from the alleged Plaintiff in Case Number 17cv3 14286 which is the nexus to Case Number 17CH007672. The subpoena'd documents and tangibles are material to both cases, relate to a determination of jurisdiction of Sunil Kulkarni and Mary Arand and their Co Parties. -2 There are on going investigation of these individuals’ repeated misconduct who are helping laundering monies for pedophiles when there is no Power of Attorney to attorneys claiming falsely they are representing the alleged Plaintiff in Case Number 17cv314286 and no relationship between Petitioner and any and all of the alleged claimants on Petitioner's land in Case Number 17c¢v314286 which is the nexus to Case No. 17CH007672. This Petition directs this court of records to order the Respondents Kulkarni and Arand to show cause why Arand and Kulkarni are not in contempt of the writs for not returning the writs and why Petitioner is not entitled to tort claims to purge Kulkarni and Arand's contempt? The two writs ordered Kulkarni in Case Number 17cv314286 and Arand in Case number 17CH007672 to furnish: 1) the Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures "CUSIP" Number; 2) All the amounts of monetization received and or to be received; 3) Sources of any and all monies received and traded on wall street within thirty -3 (30) days from the receipt of the Subpoena or by 5 p.m. on September 11", 2020 whichever happens first. The issue presented is whether or not this court must order all Respondents to appear and show cause why Respondents are not in contempt of the writs for not returning the writs and why Petitioner is not entitled to tort claims to purge Respondents’ contempt of the writs or in the alternative, this court should continue to aid and abet laundering monies for pedophiles, MS13, drug cartels, sex and human traffickers based on ignorance, on purpose or both?

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Fareed Sepheri-Fard
Fareed Sepehry-Fard — Petitioner