Whether the conduct of the United States in conducting research prior to deliberation on a trial judge's decision violated the 4th Amendment

No question identified. : O Labeda whe Sita Amend QUES onduct, Species rhe TION Owherrer the gh fecal a of +the Contain it Vee nee of discrets ¢ 1A" Amend ments in earched Case fay of Hoe United Sterte @ deli beratian . on ¢ trig! Judge fai the Consktuki priov +e delibevatta S$ was violated b Whekker the iled / refused ion of the ; ne y prejudi 5 amend 4o clismi United States was Vi eae su flere by ment of the Consti isS ) Wve nat as Violated by a Ovwhen fered by pete jy raion of he United conducted research prior , ¢ is coned ited Stexhes ae rar sie Go Amendments of nce ach where rer Conducted yea latte EUbetr nok presen address the break i Constitute gation _ other Cale ted to the j reak in u om 6f Ane Uni. & Suen oH oer ; the “chain of eee Mae Stoel wag vialah Wheber CaliCo ; esulted ih mani tect , 2 (Spanish version it red by frente eae stator eres heen @ JOY" The ¢ noINU TO42 sulted in Deputy ovs “IW Case ho. 144709) Whedher ; Saye. pe le and Bn69565 Distiey ALL ° 1947097, 2 Whether title of ose of 4 do the P ovnogs Cua le of Coy @ State of Cali eaple of 4 confiick of the S ot Conve. a5eNo l4q7 Fornra whic we Stete of Cali Tires de tate of Cal ening and re 042 and BQ Ww Deputy Distr ifovinia inpa Sendant ali fornia COnVieni 69565 ww . ‘Ch Attorn paneled oy Cun Het ng of + aS pre ey ® Whe Tenky ir Were ty Wal) fey P jrdrcr| do epresenterd. ana pelittone hen | © of +h wards pot ailed 4, neflectiy r here, nthe jar & Case j P timer dug e (27 Const ons conkvi ly y Were againg ne of y Calif, cConviede rnin P VOW, Cou: . *C.8 b8y n5el