No. 20-6659
Eddie Ashley v. California, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: california-law california-supreme-court constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-discretion sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Petitioner had a Federal Due Process Right to the Prohibition of the Imposition of Two Different Sentencing Enhancements, per the California Supreme Court's own Authority?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Does Petitioner had a Federal Due Process Right to the Prohibition of the Imposition of Two Different Sentencing Enhancements, per the California Supreme Court's own Authority?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-06
Waiver of right of respondent California, et al. to respond filed.
2020-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2021)
Attorneys
California, et al.
David Andrew Wildman — CA Atty. Gene. Offfice, Respondent
Eddie Ashley
Eddie Ashley — Petitioner