No. 20-6661

Brian Keith Figge v. Scott Frauenheim, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-defendant criminal-procedure deliberation-process due-process judicial-misconduct juror-dismissal jury-deliberations jury-selection jury-trial sixth-amendment trial-by-jury
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a trial court violate a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury when it dismisses a defense holdout juror on the third day of deliberations for 'failing to deliberate'

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does a trial court violate a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury when it dismisses a defense holdout juror on the third day of deliberations for “failing to deliberate,” even though other jurors report that the juror had been participating in the deliberations by discussing the case, discussing his point of view, and listening to the other jurors? 1 PARTIES AND LIST OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS The parties to this proceeding are Petitioner Brian Keith Figge and Respondent Scott Frauenheim, Warden. The California Attorney General represents Respondent. On December 14, 2012, Figge was convicted by jury in the Riverside County Superior Court in People v. Brian Keith Figge, case no. SWF1100774, Judge Albert J. Wojcik, presiding, of several counts of child sexual assault. Petitioner’s

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Brian Figge
Mark R. DrozdowskiOffice of the Federal Public Defend, Petitioner
Mark R. DrozdowskiOffice of the Federal Public Defend, Petitioner