No. 20-6676

Hernandez Daniels v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-12-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: alibi alibi-defense brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland constitutional-procedure criminal-appeal due-process effective-assistance evidence-suppression strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether suppression of (some) evidence is sufficient according to the procedures mandated by Brady v. Maryland

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1 Whether suppression of (some) evidence is sufficient according to the procedures mandated by Brady vy. Maryland,373 U.S.°83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed.. 24(1963). II Whether effective assistance extend to presenting : oo alibi and Pursuing Brady violation, pursuant to the holdings in Strickland v. Washington,4656 U.S. 668 : L. Ed. 2d 674, 194 S. Ct. 2052(1984). . i

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Hernandez Daniels
Hernandez Daniels — Petitioner
Hernandez Daniels — Petitioner