No. 20-6681
Robert Wright v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-remedies civil-procedure civil-rights due-process exhaustion-requirement prison-grievance prisoner-litigation pro-se-litigation procedural-default standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Wright required to exhaust state remedies under the PLRA?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : | Questions Fresedtea 1 Was Wright veguird Fo Cxhaust stipe remedes €Ved eT Dre YU POOS Was a dad edd 7 2, Because Tre fui) grevance process Wes C2 1g here. befire The dsfaey Citas? aisesseh Ts adn phistittive exbauss in, hd Ths eet fhe pugees of exbaustiol! f DA he A, Mut LOU. t yngraperly flee De birder ew Pr Wright 72 7 Ove erhiustion gut even it wet, fall PP pive him a Suthtiedt tgyTumty Fe eye? A lL Dp hanowstrare Phe grievance prricedue Ws A Meio 20? Y Dd the distiet court fai) +e deferrowe whit ot tio stonhed Goesatiag f" Dedusres wy ied? 2
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-20
Waiver of right of respondents Georgia Department of Corrections, et al. to respond filed.
2020-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Respondent
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Respondent