Whether the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that the district court did not violate Petitioner William James Jonas, III's right to counsel

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that the district court did not violate Petitioner William James Jonas, III’s right to counsel, as provided by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, when it denied substitute counsel, and failed to notify Petitioner that his current court appointed counsel would remain as counsel of record, before advising him that the option other than the denied substitution was for Petitioner to proceed pro se in preparation for his sentencing hearing? ii