Did the district court's failure to afford petitioner an opportunity to be heard prior to adjudicating him guilty of supervised release violations as well as the court's failure to determine the adequacy of a factual basis for such an adjudication of guilt deprive petitioner of his constitutional rights?

QUESTION PRESENTED In light of the decision in United States v. Haymond, 139 S.Ct. 2369 (2019), recognizing fundamental Fifth and Sixth Amendment limits on the imposition and revocation of supervised release, did the district court’s failure to afford petitioner an opportunity to be heard prior to adjudicating him guilty of supervised release violations as well as the court’s failure to determine the adequacy of a factual basis for such an adjudication of guilt deprive petitioner of his constitutional rights? i INTERESTED PARTIES The are no parties interested in the proceeding other than those named in the caption of the appellate decision. ii