No. 20-6703

Roberto Antoine Darden, aka Dizz-e, aka Javon v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: district-court factual-dispute fourth-circuit government-breach hill-v-lockhart legal-interpretation plea-bargain plea-contract prejudice prejudice-standard
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government's failure to dispute the factual manifestations of the Petitioner's government breach claim due to the plea contract's accountability clause precludes the Fourth Circuit from affirming the district court's conjecture that the Petitioner conceded paragraph four remained intact

Question Presented (from Petition)

Questions Presented L If the government refused to dispute the factual manifestations of the Petitioner’s government breach claim because clause three of the plea contract holds it accountable for any imprecisions in the statement of facts may the Fourth Circuit affirm the Rule fl court’s conjecture that the Petitioner conceded that paragraph four remained intact where the record is silent as to such concession due to said court’s ambiguous question? i. Whether the Petitioner satisfied the prejudice prong under Hill v. Lockhart, 474 US 52 (1985)?

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Roberto Antoine Darden
Roberto Antoine Darden — Petitioner
Roberto Antoine Darden — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent