No. 20-6707

Cary Lee Peterson v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-violation due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment judgment procedural-irregularity standing transcripts
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court erred in issuing an unpublished opinion without including the 'Bill of Costs' or 'Attorney's Fees' or 'Costs of Appellate Procedure' (FRAP 34(d)), and why such an irregular judgment would not be vacated or stayed

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : _ Ce G fine a _—— an unpublished opinien_, without incleding ee ‘Bill. of Cooke’ or' “Atlernoy's Fees or /Coske _ lof Appellate Procedure LEEMPI 34())C3)yand— _ irregular judgment [2]; and why a would. such -2— judgment pet be. sed oO (de 4 Stay. A,oc_vacated ee = ) “2Why would _this_ Court not find vielation +o PebHoner‘s Fifth, First, or Sith _ | proceducal , or _struchwal), resulting in a __ _| tere disad _iospassibility (hence) cainsing Petition _ ers direct appeal _4o be denied “due Lpagenom sto him net providing USCA with —_ trial court transcripts within 4 days | fram entry of ‘NOR’ Ceursuant +e. ERAP pen L

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Cary L. Peterson
Cary Lee Peterson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent