Cary Lee Peterson v. United States
DueProcess
Whether the court erred in issuing an unpublished opinion without including the 'Bill of Costs' or 'Attorney's Fees' or 'Costs of Appellate Procedure' (FRAP 34(d)), and why such an irregular judgment would not be vacated or stayed
No question identified. : _ Ce G fine a _—— an unpublished opinien_, without incleding ee ‘Bill. of Cooke’ or' “Atlernoy's Fees or /Coske _ lof Appellate Procedure LEEMPI 34())C3)yand— _ irregular judgment [2]; and why a would. such -2— judgment pet be. sed oO (de 4 Stay. A,oc_vacated ee = ) “2Why would _this_ Court not find vielation +o PebHoner‘s Fifth, First, or Sith _ | proceducal , or _struchwal), resulting in a __ _| tere disad _iospassibility (hence) cainsing Petition _ ers direct appeal _4o be denied “due Lpagenom sto him net providing USCA with —_ trial court transcripts within 4 days | fram entry of ‘NOR’ Ceursuant +e. ERAP pen L