Whether the court of appeal should have granted COA where the district court employed a constitutionally impermissible standard in evaluating the voluntariness of the confession

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Question No. i: Whether The Court Of Appeal Should Have Granted Coa Where The District Court Employed A Constitutionally Impermissible Standard In Evaluating The Voluntariness Of The Confession In Direct Contradiction To This Courts Ruling In Regers Richmond, In That The Magistrate And State Courts Consider The Truth Or Falsity Of 4 Confession In Ruling On Its Voluntariness Due Yo Drug And Sleep Deprivation, In Violation Of the Fifth, Sixth, And Fourteenth Amendment? Question No. 2: Whether The Lower Court Misapplied The Strickiand Standard To The Facts Of This Case, In Violation Of Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution? i