Whether the violation of First Amendment for practice of my Religion occurred

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR A REVIEW | Brief Introductory Statement ; . | I sincerely and humbly consider that the Religion, Nationality, Color and Age Factors greatly . : influenced the unfair Dismissal of me (Dr. Atul C. Shah, . MD) by the GM Senior Group Medical Director Dr. Stanley Miller, DO on June 11, 2008. I humbly believe that the above-mentioned factors were poorly and inadequately investigated by EEOC and Three Lower. Federal Courts for this Historic and Unprecedented . Civil Case. The above-mentioned four factors were the . primary reason and foundation for filing this Civil Case. , Herewith, I am presenting following 20 questions for a review by the honorable Supreme Court of the United States. In this small size booklet, the questions appear longer but they are shorter with only necessary detail. . This is a simple prayer. ; 1. The primary purpose of the Petition for an Extraordinary Writ is the exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of the Supreme Court’s discretionary power, and that adequate relief has not been obtained in any other form and from the EEOC, lower state or federal ; courts. This petition is in the aid of the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction. This is the primary purpose and : | an important question with this petition. | 2. Description of Caption according to the Supreme Court Rule 20.2. “In re [Atul C. Shah as Name of Petitioner]”is a Petitioner. The “Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust and Modern Educational System” is the : Respondents in the Cover Letter. So, the Petitioner Atul C. Shah, MD is a Personal feature of the Absolute Truth. The Motor Liquidation Company GUC and the Modern Educational System both are the Impersonal Feature of the Absolute Truth used in the Petition for ii ; an Extraordinary Writ with this petition. Also, there is a list of the distinguished Recipients that are persons representing the Personal Feature and the Entities are the Impersonal Feature with this petition. I am following the Supreme Court Rule 20.2 for the application of the Caption per the Vedic Wisdom of India for the Higher Dimensions and a question with this petition. 3. Whether the violation of First Amendment for practice of my Religion occurred as described in this civil case. The Prima Facie evidences, written and spoken, presented were under-investigated, distorted and put under the . rug mentality by the EEOC and the federal court judges : at the United Bankruptcy Court, the United District Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. I expressed my personal opinion that ; the Vedic Literature of India is far superior and superscientific in nature than the Conventional Modern iii Science including Bio-medical Science. The federal judges and Circuit judges unable to tolerate my personal opinion of the Superiority of the Vedic Literature and they dismissed my legal cases with the Concealed Intention violating my First Amendment right. 4, Whether EEOC was unable to conduct thorough investigation for Discrimination based upon my Religion, Nationality, Color and Age due to Lack of Man-Power rather than having No Merits with my Civil Case as explicitly described in my 11 Page Complaint Letter to EEOC dated December 8, 2008. EEOC did not check the box “No Merit” with their conclusive determination. 5. Whether the United States Bankruptcy Court erroneously concluded that EEOC dismissed my case with NO MERIT. The bankruptcy court did not pay any | attention to the 11 Page Complaint Letter submitted to EEOC. Also, EEOC Investigator did not interview any of iv , the Witnesses, scrutinize the Documents and Facts submitted with 11 Page Complaint Letter. 6. Whether the US Bankruptcy Court erred in not ; conducting the Evidentiary Hearing as suggested by the Honorable Judge Robert Gerber himself that was documented in the Bankruptcy Court Transcript dated May 15, 2012. The Honorable Judge Gerber wasplanning to conduct Evidentiary Hearing for testing witnesses as requested in