No. 20-6710
Marlon Iron Crow v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-1 criminal-law criminal-statute jury-instruction jury-instructions malice-aforethought mens-rea second-degree-murder statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'reckless' mens rea should be included in the jury instruction for 'malice aforethought' for second degree murder under 18 U.S.C. § 1
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the “reckless” mens rea should be included in the jury instruction for “malice aforethought” for second degree murder under 18 U.S.C. § 1. -1
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2021)
Attorneys
Marlon Iron Crow
Jamy Patterson — The Law Office of Jamy Patterson, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent