Pat Dee Leatherman v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
SocialSecurity Securities
Whether the defendant's statement was clearly used against him in violation of the 5th Amendment
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Sth Anerdnted ny Couyr wh wr tIess LIZ Zins myst te]ty has the Coat at : D0 Fowda te "Will wes ouerkebew by ne oa en 48e of the FM eat, mabe while He lol $,01G45, 449-61E.Ed 2d 405, y!-1a.09¢8), gen es “mnbLer ve Ferttare 474 Ws. io HO 12, "Swot wtery Stet, et,” Hig NS U stoke eg stitemert he made wis Clegily au by berg Used Is Budent oA hin’ gainst hin? eo. 2d) 25 7 ard violates the 5th Anode Contern here. day Me GF an int hin Te ee i ot oo Te pe daks pea hs this excerTe oy Phe LC ode F hy ig is karte bol yne Courts 2 Cone PAS ENA CFE Site ltites Ch Amed newt — The Fight ale EFRedtive Assistawte, oF Coctn Belle CVer7 Laut has _beew Violoted pb ie jn zdiferel PES af This Sahay with we tok woahedy eat by any Pourt oy Judge, Alemerérende Vickers Farlupe, fo vestige Sey meses, aod Failuve to get av Expert Evaluation froma forensic FeTholO oe oe a Eudente demonstrates £ Faluye to Comply with Fidipiary dat. re) ne oe) al tore chebly fhorrey michael k, Bus " Dopprs zed Apdwdomiang Huis aese yy Zcnili¢at 76 The Ap Peels flotess, feud toed thes Case. laut Apfooted & Parnes James K. We Som Chor OK restima) Fg,Lure to Pommunt bate, cweliect we ASiSTOMES Ee puns er on ait. Thre Atlowiies, wolates oth "ponder, Z GUASTIN OF Con wes v7 “fn RS Ys EFreotive Kestente oF CoumseG why has no Courl oF ACIS wot Wotieel this gud addvessed a Kemedy Fer these yialatars: Spe ‘ . ra al A gutty Plea does wot bar me, the defaw dawt Fon pny bors Teteton 8 Alam, Meta CLASS V, Lnbbed SIZES 52 4S.— Gots) by bid . . am Zz. 1g eva. Yh dneidmontA Violaton OCCars wher Aoseedtion ith holds ae “4 L i. Favordble to the 0eFendat rwethe form oF & Fhaw€ cau kebor m1 @ ioe Os Zonsow's Faitave Yo Jitabe pnhy-blood SPLater airs ater Creating The MO"™ Lk vorpal ‘obs truption of Justice. why are these Wl 2fOMS putowed Lo donTiawe Cre at ee pled y bewg hetd zopour table 2 the Mshael Mok OM fel wees be, dh te fut z Sof fo the 60 rrdplion ji Ou Justice SISTEM, why it peat Igwoved in Ttus CaS e 7 4 Copy o& the OMA motion and 2d auvwently uvit oF mandamus ts appended. re Guestton Yemdins, why are we Sul steed these Dorst Tallon a | wn Sh ab CoaRT will hovouy Them or adhear te the 6 fe tow oF The uted States oRAmenitd® The const fitlonerli VY Questar here dud Now? C,,2ef 2. ty