Mack Calvin Martin v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry
Whether the petitioner's alleged pretrial bias against him violated his due process rights
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Reb itigntsr Atléged Prat bis Arial CPUASEH jigs jC CALE Lor failomy . Ae jatrocuct, af bis suppressed feariya fety gure JF Gidaxt(A bieyde Ley? 6 tbo PEL Oat pwede bie guage. Fhe tet tivatt Bas coveted, in (arse par$, (¢ 2210 poe fp pay of fpuilicé Kiln. TBE Cree (ttedt: Cr fete? Wold tave Proce Tat He royale lilt worked atk fleet foice whee tad 10 (Cece? 70 Sep ie. Fhe Kip Gy polce Ges aie Wegel Sof ara Search. We case pbuas peed ot LGE LQMOEW CA, Glos 1002 « Ord +4é Lrial Coet gbhese jos Aiscrectvn wtbtce yf hound tlt Pettuds Lawl faite 0 poridace a hey 430, 2 Hit COPPA OP ATH SHyp, OL #E€ Priel Cit Cerise pps Gicrecpin aleet A deal Getepones Yition fo SefPOs Pee Qrgede Steed prec sesccd” AP QO plothine SOU CE ? li