No. 20-672
Thomas Gilewicz v. Brylin Hospital, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights court-proceedings due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment legal-procedure standing state-court statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTION PRESENTED Did the state court procedure in petitioner’s case violate his right to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-15
Waiver of right of respondent Balvinder S. Kang, M.D. to respond filed.
2020-11-19
Waiver of right of respondents Buffalo General Psychiatric Unit, Buffalo General Hospital to respond filed.
2020-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Balvinder S. Kang, M.D.
Buffalo General Psychiatric Unit, Buffalo General Hospital
John Patrick Danieu — Roach, Brown, McCarthy & Gruber, P.C., Respondent
John Patrick Danieu — Roach, Brown, McCarthy & Gruber, P.C., Respondent
Thomas Gilewicz
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner