No. 20-6723
Akando Ducksworth v. Hal MacMurdo, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-review civil-procedure civil-rights correctional-institute due-process medical-care prisoner-rights standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Petitioner's case should have proceeded past the dismissal phase based on the merits of his claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether this Petitioner’s case should have proceeded past the dismissal phase based on the merits of his claim. 1 PARTIES The Petitioner is Akando Duckworth, a prisoner at Dixon Correctional Institute in Jackson, Louisiana. The Respondents are Hal Macmurdo, former head doctor at Dixon Correctional Institute, Jason Kent, head warden at Dixon Correctional Institute, and Cherryl Washington, A.R.P. Screening Office at Dixon Correctional Institute. 2
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-25
Waiver of right of respondent Hal MacMurdo, et al. to respond filed.
2020-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Akando Ducksworth
Akando Ducksworth — Petitioner
Hal MacMurdo, et al.
Andrew Blanchfield — Keogh, Cox & Wilson, Ltd., Respondent