No. 20-6734
John S. Mobasseri v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2259 child-pornography criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process restitution retroactive-application statutory-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it violates due process to retroactively apply the 2018 amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 2259 to offense conduct occurring prior to the effective date of those amendments when making restitution awards in child pornography offense cases?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question Presented Whether it violates due process to retroactively apply the 2018 amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 2259 to offense conduct occurring prior to the effective date of those amendments when making restitution awards in child pornography offense cases? ii
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 1, 2021)
Attorneys
John S. Mobasseri
Jeffrey P. Nunnari — Jeffrey P. Nunnari, Esq., Petitioner
Jeffrey P. Nunnari — Jeffrey P. Nunnari, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent